[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ibus package and packages with "ibus" in its name





Em 23/04/2023 19:57, Gunnar Hjalmarsson escreveu:
On 2023-04-23 22:29, Dedeco Balaco wrote:
Em 23/04/2023 14:25, Gunnar Hjalmarsson escreveu:
Well, both ways work in some environments. Only the way described in
GNOME Help works for me on Ubuntu, for instance.

Actually, that specific docs section was rewritten a few years ago. And
I'm guilty of that.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-user-docs/-/commit/10201c14

The conclusion from the discussion in the related bug was that it's best
to describe the universally working method rather than a method which
only works for some users.
I see. But what i am suggesting here is another change. In the current
version of the documentation, it is not clear where the *ctrl* and
*shift* keys should be released. Your change removed this "detail". Now,
it is ambiguous. I released them after *typing* (where "*typing*" is to
"*press and release*") _all_ the five keys: *u* and the _4 digit hex
character code_, in this order. You released them after *typing* the *u*
key. If one of these methods do not work, the ambiguity should be
removed - right? Mentioning when the *ctrl* and *shift* keys should be
released solves it, in my opinion.
I see what you mean now. And I also notice that my original suggestion 
was slightly different:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=362300

Due to a comment from a patch reviewer I modified it to the current wording.

But you are right, it is ambiguous. Would you mind submitting a docs 
issue about it? ;)

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-user-docs/-/issues

(Otherwise I may give it a new try.)

Not at all. I will do it, right now.    (:


My environment is Debian with Mate Desktop. It started forking from
Gnome 2. This explains why both, where they work, for me: the are
software which it does not work at all; for these, i started to use any
other open window, which is usually open - and i have the habit of
always having the Pluma text editor opened in all my virtual desktops,
and it works in it.
I see.

There are 2 small errors in what i wrote in this paragraph you commented here. "[...] the are software which [...]" should have been "[...] there are softwares which [...]". And my usage of Pluma is to make the Unicode character in it, with the code point "trick" discussed, cut or copy it, and paste wherever i need. I guess it was not hard to get my correct ideas here, but...
🤷🏾‍♀️

Glad to give a small contribution to an open source project that is considered FOSS.

Regards.



Reply to: