[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ia64 qualification for Wheezy

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:18:18PM +0200, MG wrote:
>On 28-5-2012 14:20, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 01:05:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>>On 23.05.2012 19:31, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>>>On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 13:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>>>>With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our
>>>>>ears, we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of
>>>>>release architectures for the Wheezy release.
>>>>>Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
>>>>>http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be
>>>>>appreciated, as would any other information you think is relevant to
>>>>>helping us determine ia64's status for the release.
>>>>Any comments... ?
>>>One thing that was bought to my attention in private mail is #638068
>>>in initramfs-tools.
>>I'm happy to test a possible fix for #638068 on my ia64 machines.
>Me too!  I haven't been trying anything with Linux IA-64 for quite
>a bit, because I was unfortunately very busy with a study and other
>things, but now I have a lot of time.
>If anyone could fill me in, or even point me to the data in question
>(e.g. ISO images, patches, etc.), let me know.  Feel free to also
>e-mail me, if necessary or desired.

There are some pointers at

>(I have a number of video cards I want to try under Linux IA-64 as
> - MG

I intend to work as an ia64 porter.

Who would like to step forward to help maintaining the ia64 arch in

We need more people and you don't have to be a Debian developer.

Reply to: