[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Translation of package rox-filer.



Quoting Francesco P. Lovergine (frankie@debian.org):
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:13:44PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > (CC'ing to debian-i18n as that might be of interest for other
> > translators. Also CC'ing rox-filer maintainer, by courtesy as we're
> > talking about him|her)
> > 
> > (and re-cc'ing him|her as I made a typo in the package name)
> > 
> 
> Sorry, but I generally prefer some sort of cross-validation
> with translation. Probably I'm an optimist. I still use rox-filer
> and update it from time to time, but upstream has not released 
> a new version since a long period. I can upload a new translation any time now,
> if the translation is considered complete and good enough.


FWIW, and in case it wouldn't be obvious, the fact that Francesco
promptly answered does of course make any NMU intent fall in a black
hole. No need to NMU packages when they're properly  maintained..:)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: