Re: State of the release notes (was: Thanks to all)
(Sorry, one mail lost in fight against my webmail app.)
Quoting "Jens Seidel" <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:25:48AM -0800, Praveen A wrote:
2009/2/12 W. Martin Borgert <email@example.com>:
Can someone tell me when are where was the 90% cut-off decided? I
might have missed something.
It's absolutely arbitrary. Actually, I did the cut-off at less than
80%. But if people think a translation is still useful, I would
certainly not object.
I agree with Praveen that the translation should not be deactivated.
Why should it? It is currently up-to-date and only a few minor parts
are English. I don't see a problem with it.
If nobody (esp. from the release managers) objects, please re-activate
it. (I'm not able to do this before tonight, which might be too late!)
I removed nevertheless all translations with a 0% status (da, fi, nl,
PS: I also wonder that the language code in the Makefile was changed from
ml to XmlX to deactivate the build. Was this intended? Does it work?
I removed ml from the complete list of languages and renamed it only
in the XML languages list (I hope). This works.