[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How does the translation statistics evolve with time?



On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:33:39PM +0100, Nicolas François wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:57:37PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> > Some questions:
> > http://i18n.debian.net/~nekral/dl10n-rrd/unstable/po-fr.png
> > lists ca. 85% translated and the remaining part is marked "no po".
> > What does this mean?
> > 
> The graph indicates that most French POs are fully translated (there are
...
> translated), but some packages (ca. 15%) do not have a French PO (i.e.
> there is a POT file in that package, maybe some PO files for other
> languages, but no associated fr.po files).

Ah, OK. Now I understand. Could you please add a little explanation to
the top level page? Please link also to main.html, ...
 
> As the data were available, I thought it was interesting to differentiate
> the strings which are not translated in an existing PO file, and the
> strings which are not translated because there is no po files.

Yes, you're right.

Please explain why po-de.png lists 400000 strings in total, whereas
po-fr.png lists 440000 strings. Since you count also untranslated files
they should be equal, right?
 
> The po category sums all strings from any PO (po4a, podebconf or po for
> binaries).

OK.
What is the relation to the pseudo URL stuff you referred to? Do you
respect translations in the BTS only if the subject is properly choosen
or not at all?
 
> The wording for "no po" can be changed if needed.

"Strings in untranslated PO files" is a little bit long :-)
 
> > > My initial plan was only to provide the data (the .rdd files), although
> > > providing the PNG is not an issue (but IMO, these PNG would probably be
> > > more suitable in http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/rank).
> > 
> > PNG's are much nicer.
> 
> More human readable, yes ;)
> 
> But I don't want to substitute to http://www.debian.org/international/,
> which has some advantages like being translated (or translatable). If PNG
> are not provided elsewhere, I will of course continue generating them
> (maybe in another more logical place than ~nekral).
> 
> Also, if any team need to make a special graph (e.g. to compare only pt
> and pt_BR), just use the RRD (and the scripts).

I would create such diagrams using the old fancy gnuplot together which
a simple text based list. But your PNGs look probably better than gnuplot
output.

Do you want to create links from http://www.debian.org/international/?

Jens



Reply to: