On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 10:18:53AM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > (I don't know if this is the right list, but given that unbranding is > > often done to save l10n work, I'll try here) > > > > I am currently updating the new template for dash. It (stripped down) > > has the following change: > > > > -However, since the Debian policy requires > > +However, since the distribution policy > > Actualy I really don't think that this one is a branding issue, it refers to > a specific document not some losely defined distribution policy that would > be different for derivative distributions. If a derivative stops complying > with that document (thus necitating a change in this string) they'll have > bigger issues then patching strings like this. I think the problem Christian is aware of is the case where a distribution copies Debian policy, renames and updates it. But yes, for me "Debian policy" is a specific and well defined document as well, which a user can be referred to (in contrast to an abstract "distribution policy". Greetings Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature