[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How much unbranding in Debian templates



On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> (I don't know if this is the right list, but given that unbranding is
> often done to save l10n work, I'll try here)
>
> I am currently updating the new template for dash. It (stripped down)
> has the following change:
>
> -However, since the Debian policy requires
> +However, since the distribution policy

Actualy I really don't think that this one is a branding issue, it refers to 
a specific document not some losely defined distribution policy that would 
be different for derivative distributions. If a derivative stops complying 
with that document (thus necitating a change in this string) they'll have 
bigger issues then patching strings like this.
-- 
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: