[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#639517: Riddling absence of /usr/lib/libattr.la

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:01:12AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit :
>>This idea must come from libacl-dev.
>>And really in
>>  /lib/libacl.la
>>i read
>>  dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la'
>Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because
>libattr.la is not shipped any more. That would be fixed by a newer build
>of the acl package, but unfortunately it FTBFS ATM (PATH_MAX, #636512).

You suggest to reintroduce .la files for acl and attr and use -lattr in
dependency_libs of /lib/libacl.la after fixing #636512, right?

I think we could try it.

>libisofs not building was becoming more and more a problem, so I patched
>the libacl.la file by hand (yes, a bad thing).
>>So probably one should re-name the bug to
>>  "libacl-dev on hurd-i386 depends on LAFileRemoval victim libattr.la"
>Well, for the hurd-i386 case, just a rebuild should work, it just
>doesn't build any more.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: