On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:01:12AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit : >>This idea must come from libacl-dev. >>And really in >> /lib/libacl.la >>i read >> dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la' > >Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because >libattr.la is not shipped any more. That would be fixed by a newer build >of the acl package, but unfortunately it FTBFS ATM (PATH_MAX, #636512). You suggest to reintroduce .la files for acl and attr and use -lattr in dependency_libs of /lib/libacl.la after fixing #636512, right? I think we could try it. >libisofs not building was becoming more and more a problem, so I patched >the libacl.la file by hand (yes, a bad thing). > >>So probably one should re-name the bug to >> "libacl-dev on hurd-i386 depends on LAFileRemoval victim libattr.la" > >Well, for the hurd-i386 case, just a rebuild should work, it just >doesn't build any more. > >Samuel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature