[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#639517: Riddling absence of /usr/lib/libattr.la

Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, le Mon 29 Aug 2011 22:10:25 +1000, a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:01:12AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit :
> >>This idea must come from libacl-dev.
> >>And really in
> >>  /lib/libacl.la
> >>i read
> >>  dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la'
> >
> >Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because
> >libattr.la is not shipped any more. That would be fixed by a newer build
> >of the acl package, but unfortunately it FTBFS ATM (PATH_MAX, #636512).
> You suggest to reintroduce .la files for acl and attr and use -lattr in
> dependency_libs of /lib/libacl.la after fixing #636512, right?

Not at all. I'm suggesting simply fixing the acl FTBFS, since it should
solve the whole issue.


Reply to: