[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: glibc



On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 06:50:06PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Do I need a cvs-hurd or a cvs-gnumach to compile it?

I don't think so.

> gcc-3.3 ../sysdeps/i386/setfpucw.c -c -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -Winline -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -fstrict-aliasing -g -pipe -Wno-parentheses -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4    -Wno-uninitialized -D__NO_MATH_INLINES -D__LIBC_INTERNAL_MATH_INLINES -I../include -I. -I/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/build-tree/hurd-i386-libc/math -I.. -I../libio -I../hurd -I/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/build-tree/hurd-i386-libc/hurd/ -I../mach -I/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/build-tree/hurd-i386-libc/mach/ -I/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/build-tree/hurd-i386-libc -I../sysdeps/i386/elf -I../sysdeps/mach/hurd/i386 -I../sysdeps/mach/hurd -I../sysdeps/gnu -I../sysdeps/unix/bsd/bsd4.4 -I../sysdeps/unix/mman -I../sysdeps/mach/i386 -I../sysdeps/mach -I../sysdeps/i386/fpu -I../sysdeps/i386 -I../sysdeps/wordsize-32 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-96 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32 -I../sysdeps/unix/bsd -I../sysdeps/unix/common -I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/ieee754 -I../sysdeps/generic/elf -I../sysdeps/generic  -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include ../include/libc-symbols.h       -o /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/build-tree/hurd-i386-libc/math/setfpucw.o -MD -MP -MF /build/buildd/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/build-tree/hurd-i386-libc/math/setfpucw.o.dt
> ../sysdeps/i386/setfpucw.c: In function `__setfpucw':
> ../sysdeps/i386/setfpucw.c:43: error: `HWCAP_I386_XMM' undeclared (first use in this function)
> ../sysdeps/i386/setfpucw.c:43: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> ../sysdeps/i386/setfpucw.c:43: error: for each function it appears in.)

That one (and a couple of others) are fixed in CVS, thanks to ams.

I've got a dpatch for that one if you or Jeff are interested. But I
guess waiting for the next debian release with pulls from CVS will be
easier.


Michael



Reply to: