Re: K4
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 07:16:12AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:24:37PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > If it just was rejected because it was an horrid kludge but still it
> > works fine, then we should apply it in Debian since this bug is
> > breaking all packages that need semaphores to build or work at all.
>
> It's not that simple - If the kludge is difficult to recover from, it
> must NOT be included. This includes: RPC Changes, ABI/API
> breakage/changes, hacks that prevent programs from running on other
> non-Debian systems...
ok.
> This patch mildly falls into this category, because it's adding a new
> interface. Since it's likely that we'll switch to NPTL at some point,
You mean Native POSIX Thread Library for Linux? Isn't it, well, for Linux? :)
Or did they mean for GNU userland when they said "for Linux"?
--
Robert Millan
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: K4
- From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>
- References:
- K4
- From: Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz>
- Re: K4
- From: Marco Gerards <metgerards@student.han.nl>
- Re: K4
- From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>
- Re: K4
- From: Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es>
- Re: K4
- From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>
- Re: K4
- From: ja2morri@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (James Morrison)
- Re: K4
- From: Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es>
- Re: K4
- From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>