Re: status of coreutils
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 04:38:47PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> 1- PATH_MAX bug reported to upstream , being sent to debianbts
> Could you check how this bug got into coreutils? Because I know that
> previous version (i.e. beta versions) didn't have this bug.
that's wrong, see the build log for 4.5.10:
> You might
> also want to send the bug report to bug-gnu-utils since I don't know
> how often Jim or Paul read the Savannah bug section.
I just wrote a note to bug-coreutils, will that suffice?
> Isn't this an old and known bug? Or am I confusing it with something
> Isn't this the same as the /tmp permission bug that foobared the
> file-system that was reported a few months ago?
heck, i guess i'm out of sync with the lists. i tend to use the debian
bts for libc, hurd and mach bugs, and these weren't reported..
anyway, i didn't harm anyone ;)
> If so maybe Roland
> should get of his lazy ass and apply the patch that someone sent. :-)
good to see there's a patch!
make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Stop.
Another world is possible - Just say no to genocide