Re: /X11R6 -> . (was: X11 failled to run)
On Die, Nov 27, 2001 at 03:09:14 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:06:53AM +0100, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> > This works perfectly for me and I thought it had meanwhile been
> > "officially" accepted.
> This can only do Branden Robinson. Everyone here is happy with this
> solution, but we don't maintain the X packages.
> > If this solution has been officialy adopted (has it?) by the Debian
> > Hurd developers, has a bug concerning the installation procedure been
> > filed against the two packages mentioned above?
> Feel free to check out and do it if nobody did:
There is a pending wishlist item for xfree86-common
reported Oct 6 2001. But the reporter argues for /usr/X11R6 to become a
symlink to /usr on *all* platforms. Not surprisingly, Branden responded
that this was such a major change, that he cannot decide upon
unilaterally. Anyhow, I guess this is not what we need. We
only need installation to work *too*, if /X11R6 is a Symlink.
So maybe I'll file a new bug report.