Re: /X11R6 -> . (was: X11 failled to run)

To: Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@comlink.apc.org>
Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: /X11R6 -> . (was: X11 failled to run)
From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:09:14 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011127150914.A509@212.23.136.22>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87itbxxejm.fsf_-_@rudi.comlink.apc.org>
References: <[🔎] 1006774155.3c02278b7dff5@webmail.tiscalinet.be> <[🔎] 877ksd1tkd.fsf@gryffindor.sc> <[🔎] 87itbxxejm.fsf_-_@rudi.comlink.apc.org>

On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:06:53AM +0100, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> This works perfectly for me and I thought it had meanwhile been
> "officially" accepted.

This can only do Branden Robinson.  Everyone here is happy with this
solution, but we don't maintain the X packages.
 
> If this solution has been officialy adopted (has it?) by the Debian
> Hurd developers, has a bug concerning the installation procedure been
> filed against the two packages mentioned above?

Feel free to check out and do it if nobody did:
http://bugs.debian.org/<package>

Thanks,
Marcus

-- 
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org brinkmd@debian.org
Marcus Brinkmann              GNU    http://www.gnu.org    marcus@gnu.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /X11R6 -> . (was: X11 failled to run)
  - From: Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@gmx.de>

References:
- X11 failled to run (was: H1 images - comments and questions)
  - From: joel.soete@freebel.net
- Re: X11 failled to run (was: H1 images - comments and questions)
  - From: Moritz Schulte <moritz@duesseldorf.ccc.de>
- /X11R6 -> . (was: X11 failled to run)
  - From: Johannes Rohr <j.rohr@comlink.apc.org>

Prev by Date: /X11R6 -> . (was: X11 failled to run)
Next by Date: Re: system crash when much disk io
Previous by thread: /X11R6 -> . (was: X11 failled to run)
Next by thread: Re: /X11R6 -> . (was: X11 failled to run)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread