On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 11:57:39AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Steve Bowman wrote:
> > I don't know if -ahurd-i386 is really needed
> only for cross compilation
> > but the PATH setting
> > definitely is.
> Uh, this would be a bug.
I think this is a porting issue. It's needed by dh_installdebconf to
find debconf-mergetemplate (at least). /me does some checking. Ack.
My mistake I think. I see debconf-mergetemplate is in debconf-utils and
last I checked, this was built from debconf source and not available -
I thought I had a self-dependency to work around. Now I see debconf-utils
is available and not installed. I think I missed a build dependency.
Interestingly, debconf-utils didn't get built. Probably, it's
binary-indep and -B suppressed it (I'm guessing).
> > Also, there are a number of warnings about unterminated
> > character constants from *.pm files and dpkg warnings are architecture
> > 'i386' not in remapping table,
> the latter means something calls dpkg --print-*-architecture, which
> would be
> a bug, too (most likely).
Probably. dpkg-architecture is what the scripts should be calling, right?
Steve Bowman <email@example.com> (preferred)
Buckeye, AZ <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd <http://www.debian.org>
- From: Steve Bowman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Re: debconf
- From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>