[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debconf

Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:

> >     export PATH=$PATH:`pwd`/Client
> Uh, this would be a bug.

debconf build-depends on debconf-utils which depends on debconf,
again. I'll ask on debian-devel if this is legal.

> > and dpkg warnings are architecture
> > 'i386' not in remapping table,
> the latter means something calls dpkg --print-*-architecture, which
> would be a bug, too (most likely).

Why would that be a bug? Because the envvar-override is not heeded?

Most debhelper scripts call this in their initialization phase - see
/usr/lib/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Lib.pm line 347


Attachment: signature.ng
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: