Re: egcs or gcc?
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>I propose that we use egcs for both, C and C++. Any objections?
I agree with this totally. The only reason I ever kept gcc 2.7 around was
to build linux-2.0 kernels, but now that i'm using 2.2 i've scrapped it
completely.
Since we don't (hopefully!) have to deal with a incorrectly-coded kernel,
there should be no reason to stick with what is effectively an out-of-date
compiler.
two cents (give or take),
ed.
Reply to:
- References:
- egcs or gcc?
- From: Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de>