Re: Still interested in maintaining singularity-container?
Hi,
Am Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 03:59:41PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> I'll remove you for now then. If you find a sponsor, please add in
> yourself back.
As usuall anyone is welcome to add the own id to Uploaders. ;-)
> And so I am not entirely sure if it makes sense to package apptainer separately or
> not. And what would be the implications et. al.
> What do you think?
>
> Also, @Andreas was doing some work on apptainer front - there is even a repo here[4].
> @Andreas, do you have some update about this?
I've cloned packaging of singularity (including its Uploaders!) into the
apptainer repository. It seems there are some missing Build-Depends. I
have not checked yet since we have a working singularity package now.
My effort was motivated by the need to have *any* package to run
singularity containers. Since this is solved now I did not (yet)
continued that effort (but as Dmitry said: If someone might sponsor
me to do this I could think about this. ;-) )
BTW, since I do not speak Go I'm not the best person to work on this.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> > [1]: https://apptainer.org/
> [2]: https://apptainer.org/news/community-announcement-20211130/
> [3]: https://www.reddit.com/r/HPC/comments/r61bto/comment/hmspn72/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
> [4]: https://salsa.debian.org/hpc-team/apptainer
>
> --
> Best,
> Nilesh
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: