Hi Ilias, Quoting Ilias Tsitsimpis (2018-10-23 16:20:14) > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 08:23AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Why do you try upgrade to Pandoc 2.3.1 when that is not supported by > > BlogLiterally? > > From what you said, I understood that you had pandoc-2.3.1 ready to be > uploaded, so I tested it against the current set of Haskell packages > to see whether it was compatible or not. I couldn't know that until I > had tested it. Ah, I understand. My choice of word was bad: I meant it was ready for _after_ the current set of Haskell libraries had entered unstable. I am still quite interested in the possibility of getting hsYaml packaged, so that I can try explore if possible to relax some of the other library dependencies too tight for what is now entering unstable. > > I would guess that the solution is to simply request a binNMU of > > Pandoc - not touch its source at all for that migration. > > I agree with you. We should stay with pandoc-2.2.1 for the time being. > > It seems that binNMUs will not work, since pandoc build-depends on > libghc-tasty-dev (< 1.1), but 1.1.0.3 is available on unstable. Could > you please fix that? Great. I am on it now! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature