Re: new upcoming Pandoc dependency

[Ilias Tsitsimpis <iliastsi@debian.org>]

Hi Jonas,

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 08:23AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Why do you try upgrade to Pandoc 2.3.1 when that is not supported by 
> BlogLiterally?

>From what you said, I understood that you had pandoc-2.3.1 ready to be
uploaded, so I tested it against the current set of Haskell packages to
see whether it was compatible or not. I couldn't know that until I had
tested it.

> I would guess that the solution is to simply request a 
> binNMU of Pandoc - not touch its source at all for that migration.

I agree with you. We should stay with pandoc-2.2.1 for the time being.

It seems that binNMUs will not work, since pandoc build-depends on
libghc-tasty-dev (< 1.1), but 1.1.0.3 is available on unstable.
Could you please fix that?

P.S. pandoc's build-dependencies are now available on unstable,
hopefully. If this is not the case, please let me know.

Thanks!

-- 
Ilias