[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GHC-7.10 fallout



On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:47:08 +0200
Kristoffer Rose <kristoffer.rose@gmail.com> wrote:

> stmlib and hstmlib: these I am working on but they have no reverse
> deps so you can remove them if you wish. --Kris

If you are working on it, it's fine. I just don't like to fix packages,
that no one actually cares about.

Regards
Sven

> On Aug 21, 2015 12:06 AM, "Sven Bartscher" <
> sven.bartscher@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:57:13 +0200
> > Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > haskell-edison-core_1.2.2.1-3
> > > >  ^- needs adjustment due to AMP. Does anyone care? Else we can
> > > > remove Edison*
> > >
> > > Still open
> > >
> > [...]
> > > > haskell-x509-util_1.5.2-1
> > > >  ^- https://github.com/vincenthz/hs-certificate/issues/54
> > >
> > > Nix has removed that packages. Should we as well?
> > >
> > > > frown_0.6.1-14.1
> > > >  ^- AMP fallout. simple patch required
> > >
> > > Still open. Any takers?
> > >
> > > > haskell-scrobble_0.2.1.1-3
> > > >  ^- https://github.com/chrisdone/scrobble/issues/2
> > > >     Drop this?
> > >
> > > Upstram might look into. But still, this is a non-key non-stackage
> > > package. Drop it?
> >
> > I don't care about these and they don't have reverse dependencies.
> > If no one speaks up for them I suggest that we remove them. Should
> > we set some kind of deadline for that?
> >
> > [...]
> > > > haskell-hsmtlib_0.2.0.6-1
> > > >  ^- Kris is on it
> > >
> > > Still open. Any takers?
> > [...]
> > I can't find this in the package-plan. Am I too stupid or is there
> > some catch?
> >
> > Regards
> > Sven
> >
> >


Reply to: