Dear Iustin, Am Montag, den 14.07.2014, 22:32 +0200 schrieb Iustin Pop: > Just checked now, and even for a "real" (non-autopkgtest) install, it > still downloads. So there seems to be something wrong with > update-hoogle… > > It seems that hoogle changed significantly between 4.2.26 and 4.2.27; > the changelog mentions just "Rewrite how "hoogle data" works", but what > I see: > > - 4.2.26 still uses the $DATADIR/download (which we pre-populate), but > that code is removed in 84a26afff2, because: > - commit e6c1dfb5d6 closes issue 47, "Use Shake for generating the > databases"; this changes the path to downloads/, and expects different > things > > I guess our update-hoogle is now quite outdated, so needs > rewriting to be able to (again) fake things as to how hoogle expects > them. Good analysis so far! > I would guess that the upstream is not following our use case well, so > maybe we should with him if we want to be able to keep packaging hoogle… > Shall I? Yes, that would be great. Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part