Re: haskell-debian vs. newest HaXml
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 07:02:23AM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> This would suggest that we need a HaXmL1.13 and leave the current
> HaxMl unchanged.
I'm a bit puzzled why you want to declare all the current[*] haxml-using Debian
packages buggy.
[*] Well, strictly speaking the packages as of when the haxml package was
upgraded.
--
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, Jyväskylä, Finland
http://antti-juhani.kaijanaho.fi/newblog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/antti-juhani/
Reply to: