Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2009, 22:07 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > I also just found this : > > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Creating_Debian_packages_from_Cabal_package > > and the first method there looks pretty damn close to me :-). Given that it’s written by Marco, who did most of the recent development with haskell-devscripts, this is indeed pretty accurate. (I mostly copy from one of his packages, which is, in the end, the same thing). I think the haskell-utils part of that page can be removed. Am Mittwoch, den 08.07.2009, 14:04 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > Finally, there is the issue of group policy. I'm not sure what the > current situation is regarding git vs darcs and so on so I'll let > someone else (Joachim ;)) inform you about that. The wiki seems > outdated here. It’s still open. Nobody has wildly opposed either git or darcs, just preferences were expressed. Given that pet.cgi exists for darcs now, but not for git, I see an advantage there, but I’m not going to force anyone. I think a consensus will be reached in a short time just by seeing which one is used more actively. Ketil, please remember that there is not only the question of how to package a library, but also whether; not everything on hackage should also be in Debian. For example the few lines of code in http://hackage.haskell.org/package/higherorder are not worth a package yet, at least not unless an important library/program depends on it. What do you plan to package? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil