Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 27.01.2009, 16:40 +0000 schrieb Magnus Therning:
>> There has been no answer to John's question regarding GHC 6.10 not
>> hitting Sid yet (not even experimental). Please let us know how to
>> help out! Please, pretty please. With sugar on top!
>>
>> I'm not a DD, so I'm unlikely to be able to help out as much as John,
>> but I'll do what I can. I just need a pointer or two on what needs to
>> be done.
>>
>> Once 6.10 is in Sid/Experimental I think it's time to have a
>> discussion on how to improve the situation around GHC. If memory
>> serves me there was a similar situation when 6.8 was released.
>
> you must have missed it: kaol started to upload stuff, including
> ghc6-6.10, to experimental, and were having quite some discussions about
> that here on this list:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-haskell/2009/01/msg00033.html
>
> You are subscribed to this list, right?
Hmm, I thought I was, but it seems I've been missing mails so I
re-subscribed again today.
> But anyway, thanks for checking back and offering your help. I don’t
> know where kaol can use some help, but I’m sure he’ll tell us if it’s
> so.
I see the build failed on ia64 and s390. Is anyone building for amd64?
(I can't find any packages in experimental for it anyway.)
/M
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
http://therning.org/magnus
Haskell is an even 'redder' pill than Lisp or Scheme.
-- PaulPotts
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature