Hi Christoph,Thank you very much! I will modify file debian/control with the new section non-free/hamradio and leave the other packages untouched. Then I will resubmit the package to mentor.
Other questions:Is there anything I can do to push forward the 2 packages (odr-dabmux and odr-dabmod) that are still sitting in NEW?
Do you believe that there is a chance that the 4 packages could be available on time for the next freeze? If not, is there a way to exclude the package odr-padenc (the only one that made it to unstable, so far) from the next version, for I would like to have a consistent set of packages (odr-padenc, alone, does not bring any value).
Robin On 17.10.22 22:48, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Robin AlexanderLet's assume that the reject reason is valid. What is the procedure I must follow to submit the odr-audioenc package to non-free? Is there any debian file I must amend for non-free as well ?Section: non-free/whateversectionyouhavenowOn a more "philisophical" aspect, would it make sense to submit the other 3 odr packages to non-free as well, even if they don't rely on this fdk-aac library/license, in order to keep software distribution consistency. I would find rather odd, as a user, to grab 1 package from non-free and the other 3 from main...Keep them in main if they are free. Putting free software into non-free will raise a lot more questions. (You might consider using contrib, but... ymmv.) Christoph
-- Robin ALEXANDER
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB44D368855690D0F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature