[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Trying to join the hamradio team





On 08.11.21 at 16:45 wrote David Ranch:
Direwolf can be directly connected to the Linux AX.25 stack either via it's PTS pseudo-serial interface or it's TCP-KISS interface and socat.

Yes, thank you, I know all these facts and I have successfully tried them out. The kissattach program, however, is needed to connect the ptty. Unfortunately kissattach is not very systemd friendly because it does not store its pid into a file, so it can be controlled. Yes this could be fixed by fixing kissattach, and yes the issue can be worked around. "soundmodem" on the other hand does not need kissatach because it uses the kernel mkiss interface.

Next up, yes, soundmodem does offer the ability to send AX.25 packets over at least one alternative mode but in my experience, that one mode didn't perform very well and never gained any adoption.

Perhaps we do not understand the same thing when speaking about modes? What I mean is that you can set up, say 1200Bd and 9600Bd on the same radio link at the same time (well almost), i.e. you can work two different stations each connected at its speed of the same radio link. To my knowledge this is a feature that is planned for direwolf, but not available today, correct?

Direwolf offers multiple modes (AFSK, FSK, PSK, QPSK, IL2P, etc) as well as FX.25 support be it for speed, robustness, etc.

Yes this a impressive.

Finally, if you run various packet decode tests, you'll see that Thomas Sailers's soundmodem gets about a 60-65% decode rate where as Direwolf, UZ7HO's soundmodem, and even some hardware TNCs get in upwards of 95%:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wb2osz/direwolf/master/doc/WA8LMF-TNC-Test-CD-Results.pdf

Thank you for the pointer, I will look into this later when I have some time.

73 Roland, oe1rsa
--
__________________________________________
  _  _  | Roland Schwarz
 |_)(_  |
 | \__) | mailto:roland.schwarz@blackspace.at
________| http://www.blackspace.at


Reply to: