Re: What ever happened to gnome-office?
- To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: What ever happened to gnome-office?
- From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Date: 27 Jan 2003 03:14:26 -0500
- Message-id: <1043655265.24299.0.camel@space-ghost>
- In-reply-to: <20030127025848.GA32657@espresso>
- References: <1042869026.8697.22.camel@space-ghost> <20030118063059.GP1857@lazarus> <1042875006.9601.2.camel@space-ghost> <20030118080821.GQ1857@lazarus> <1042965774.26770.13.camel@pisces.woot.net> <1042995605.2869.8.camel@space-ghost> <20030120094629.GA621@espresso> <1043081694.19782.9.camel@space-ghost> <20030126083110.GA17348@billgotchy.de> <1043600169.17918.0.camel@space-ghost> <20030127025848.GA32657@espresso>
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 21:58, Andrew Lau wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 11:56:09AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 03:31, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> >
> > > We have all nessassary gnome-office packages, Abiword, Gnumeric etc etc,
> > > we have kde-office and we have a fully OpenOffice.org suite ....
> >
> > What else would go into a gnome-office? abiword-gnome and gnumeric are
> > now part of the full 'gnome' task.
>
> It doesn't really make sense to me to have abiword-gnome and gnumeric
> in the gnome meta-task. One example would be someone is installing a
> GNOME based kiosk with just Galeon.
So install 'gnome-core' and galeon.
Reply to: