Re: Bits from the GNOME Team
- To: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org, jordi@debian.org, joss@debian.org, netsnipe@users.sourceforge.net, ross@burtonini.com, tagoh@debian.org, kitame@debian.org, emil@nishra.com, j.rohr@comlink.apc.org, ejad@debian.org, kov@debian.org, robster@debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bits from the GNOME Team
- From: Rob Bradford <rob@robster.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:20:13 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1064406012.540.7.camel@ares.internal.robster.org.uk>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87r827mdng.fsf@seb128.wanadoo.fr>
- References: <[🔎] 87r827mdng.fsf@seb128.wanadoo.fr>
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 21:51, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> 1- Maintainer/Uploaders fields :
> --------------------------------
>
> After having talked with some of you, I think the best format is:
>
> Maintainer: the maintainer
> Uploaders: the team, [complete list of the members]
>
>
> In this way :
>
> - The package keeps his maintainer (who know the best the package, the
> upstreams, etc ..)
> - We have a QA page for the team
> - All members can upload with their name.
I agree but this seems a bit unwieldly and difficult to maintain. I
wonder if we can produce some awful hack that can replace a string
within the Uploaders: field with a list of the uploaders. Similar to
${shlibs:Depends}.
Cheers,
Rob
--
Rob Bradford <rob@robster.org.uk>
Reply to: