Le sam 13/09/2003 à 10:26, Sven Luther a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 11:30:21PM -0400, James Strandboge wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 19:44, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, it is only for i386. All the sources are there, ready to > > > > > > Yep, that is what i feared. That is really the problem with having > > > backports outside of the debian infrastructure, you only ever get x86. > > > > > Well, it's all I have at the moment. Someone did email me saying they > > were interested in compiling the backport on ppc-- but I never heard > > back. Like I said, if anyone wants to step up, I'll take patches and > > could probably get it mirrored. > > If need be, i would be happy to try to provide an autobuilder, and see > about the fixing problems as they occur. I would like to, yes. If it proves to be useful, I could then even provide such an autobuilder for x86 also. > That said, i question the need of woody backports now that sarge release > is in hands reach, but then you never know. In my mind, I don't see really why we wouldn't continue this backport, but for Sarge (with GNOME 2.4 ;-)), once it is released. > Friendly, > > Sven Luther -- Jérôme Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=