Re: GDM 2.4 in sid
Ari Pollak <ari@debian.org> writes:
> [Please CC me.]
> I apologize for not seeing that, there were no objections directly sent
> to the ITP bug, and when I checked the debian-devel archives at the time
> there were no objections either. I did not want to NMU or adopt the
> existing gdm package, as the maintainer still seemed to be active, just
> somewhat ignoring the new gdm releases. I'll go ahead and file an ITA
An ITA mean Intent To Adopt, and no the current gdm maintainer doesn't
maintain this package. The current maintainer is may be active for
its others Debian jobs (ftpadmin, mipsel buildd) but not for this
package.
If you do an ITA please add a Cc: to -devel and to the maintainer.
Christian
Reply to: