[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GNOME 1 ABI involving libpng



If you're going to dismiss a complaint that refers to so many issues
that have been brought up here so regularly, at least try to address why
his complaints are invalid.

Alot of people are genuinely considered about the state of Gnome/Gnome2
in debian, and probabbly rightly so, considering its importance as a
large desktop environment. Either there are valid problems left to be
addressed, or there has been a lack of communication as to how this
issues have been addressed. Clearly neither of these possibilities is
ideal.

On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 01:13, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Jeff Waugh <jdub@perkypants.org> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >   (Sorry, but GNOME is currently a huge mess in Debian, between a haphazard
> >   upgrade of 2.x to libpng3, screwing up the ABI of 1.x via libpng3, and the
> >   zero-strategy migration to GNOME 2.x in unstable. I'm not used to this
> >   kind of blundering from Debian projects... This one seriously needs
> >   informed and cooperative leadership.)
> 
> Only one word, bullshit. And please stop your troll in our list.
> 
> Christian
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
-- 
Jeremy Nickurak -= Email/Jabber: atrus@rifetech.com =-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: