[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bonobo-activation1.0 will be uploaded



On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 12:06, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> Eduardo Pérez Ureta <eperez@it.uc3m.es> writes:
> 
> 
> > Why instead of breaking old packages you make bonobo-activation2.1
> > packages and put them in experimental
> > while preserving 1.0.x with an epoch as Raphael suggests?
> 
> Using an epoch sounds like a good idea, but if the 2.1 packages will be
> uploaded to experimental why the need to add the "2.1" suffix? Uploading
> them to experimental with the same name so they replace the same
> packages in unstable when the time comes should be enough. People that
> want to use the 2.1 version of b-a can just add "experimental" to their
> sources.list.
> 
> We have enough packages already, IMHO.

Yes we have enough packages. I think that we should skip 2.1 in sid or
experimental. We are having a deal of a time as it is with 2.0.2. We
need to decide what is in sid either 2.0.2 or 2.1.x. IMHO I would setup
a non-offical apt-repository and host 2.1 for those who wish to use 2.1
and keep 2.0.2 in sid/experimental. if i am not mistaken even releases
ie 2.0 2.2 are suppose to be the "stable" releases. therefor 2.1 2.3 ect
should not go into sid as sid is to become a stable distro release. Just
my 3 cents.


-- 
Sean Harshbarger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: