Re: bonobo-activation1.0 will be uploaded
On 2002-11-23 12:06:12 -0500, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> Eduardo Pérez Ureta <eperez@it.uc3m.es> writes:
> > Why instead of breaking old packages you make bonobo-activation2.1
> > packages and put them in experimental
> > while preserving 1.0.x with an epoch as Raphael suggests?
>
> Using an epoch sounds like a good idea, but if the 2.1 packages will be
> uploaded to experimental why the need to add the "2.1" suffix? Uploading
> them to experimental with the same name so they replace the same
> packages in unstable when the time comes should be enough. People that
> want to use the 2.1 version of b-a can just add "experimental" to their
> sources.list.
I just said this because, from Takuo mail, it seems the packages have
different ABI as he was planning to make a bonobo-activation1.0 package
Reply to: