Re: Why is nautilus2 still nautilus2?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Em 04 Nov 2002 19:53:18 -0500, Colin Walters <firstname.lastname@example.org> escreveu:
> On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 13:31, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > I thought everyone had agreed on moving GNOME2 to unstable and removing
> > the 2 suffix, while I was updating my backport, though, I was surprised
> > to see nautilus 1.0.6 was downloaded by my 'apt-get source' command.
> Already filed as #166074.
ok... I didn't check the bug list, thought there was a reason for
keeping the old name for nautilus
email@example.com: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov>
Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://www.debian-br.org>
Dúvidas sobre o Debian? Visite o Rau-Tu: http://rautu.cipsga.org.br
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----