Re: Why is nautilus2 still nautilus2?

To: Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org>
Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why is nautilus2 still nautilus2?
From: Takuo KITAME <kitame@northeye.org>
Date: 08 Nov 2002 17:13:22 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 1036743203.18881.5.camel@spike>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021105024238.2778abdb.kov@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 20021104163100.1dbfe3df.kov@debian.org> <[🔎] 1036457599.31871.0.camel@space-ghost> <[🔎] 20021105024238.2778abdb.kov@debian.org>

Hi.

I've uploaded nautilus_2.0.7-3 as package name 'nautilus' into
experimental.

Thanks.
-- 
Takuo Kitame.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is nautilus2 still nautilus2?
  - From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

References:
- Why is nautilus2 still nautilus2?
  - From: Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org>
- Re: Why is nautilus2 still nautilus2?
  - From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: Why is nautilus2 still nautilus2?
  - From: Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org>

Prev by Date: random gnome slow down
Next by Date: Re: Gnome2 and Japanese AA fonts.
Previous by thread: Re: Why is nautilus2 still nautilus2?
Next by thread: Re: Why is nautilus2 still nautilus2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread