Why is nautilus2 still nautilus2?

[Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello, 

I thought everyone had agreed on moving GNOME2 to unstable and removing
the 2 suffix, while I was updating my backport, though, I was surprised
to see nautilus 1.0.6 was downloaded by my 'apt-get source' command.

I then checked and nautilus is still nautilus2, any reason for that?

[kov]@[auric]:[~] # madison nautilus
  nautilus |    1.0.6-5 |        stable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
  nautilus |  1.0.6-7.1 |       testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
  nautilus |  1.0.6-7.1 |      unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
[kov]@[auric]:[~] # madison nautilus2
 nautilus2 |    2.0.7-1 |      unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

[]s!

- -- 
kov@debian.org: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov>
Debian: <http://www.debian.org>  *  <http://www.debian-br.org>
Dúvidas sobre o Debian? Visite o Rau-Tu: http://rautu.cipsga.org.br
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9xrzkt1anjIgqbEsRAicTAKDqlr7BP12ptyBm6Jdky7pyL+YDBACfZ892
vT8xz0xSGPE73+VaMzA8F3g=
=tDob
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----