Re: gdm and libpam0g?
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:06:19AM -0400, David Megginson wrote:
> Sven Luther writes:
> > > I hope you're not using the pam stuff from experimental...
> > One more reason for not having gnome2 in experimental, i guess a lot of
> > people will just do an : apt-get -t experimental dist-upgrade or
> > something such, as i almost did (to see if it would work, but i
> > interrupted it when i saw non gnome stuff going to be installed).
> I didn't do a dist-upgrade, but I do do
> apt-get -t experimental upgrade
Well, you will get all of the experimental stuff all the same.
> I don't mind that things break sometimes, and I'm happy to submit bug
> reports. Should I assume that libpam0-modules in experimental is
> currently broken?
Well, experimental is supposed to be for things too broken for normal
usage, and people install things from there at their own risk.
I don't think it was the most user friendly place for putting gnome2.