Re: gdm and libpam0g?

To: debian-gtk-gnome <debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: gdm and libpam0g?
From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 09:16:56 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 15773.38088.465637.702295@megginson.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 15773.37451.674719.92715@megginson.com>
References: <[🔎] 15773.34757.855758.447340@megginson.com> <[🔎] 1033734506.1131.774.camel@tibook> <[🔎] 20021004123903.GA32409@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> <[🔎] 15773.37451.674719.92715@megginson.com>

David Megginson writes:

 > I don't mind that things break sometimes, and I'm happy to submit bug
 > reports.  Should I assume that libpam0-modules in experimental is
 > currently broken?

Downgrading to libpam0g and libpam-modules from sid worked fine.
Thanks, everyone.

All the best,

David

-- 
David Megginson, david@megginson.com, http://www.megginson.com/

Reply to:

References:
- gdm and libpam0g?
  - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Re: gdm and libpam0g?
  - From: Michel Dänzer <daenzer@debian.org>
- Re: gdm and libpam0g?
  - From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: gdm and libpam0g?
  - From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Gnome 2.0 antialiased fonts (got it working)
Next by Date: Re: Gnome 2.0 antialiased fonts (got it working)
Previous by thread: Re: gdm and libpam0g?
Next by thread: Re: gdm and libpam0g?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread