Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal

To: debian-go@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal
From: Martin Dosch <martin@mdosch.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 20:21:06 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20221101192106.chsl4vq6zzzukavq@mdosch.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAFyCLW-Ow2JWqwGkmKe3RfsbJ5VvRUvfYy1eOQx9OPYiSEVd3A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20221031093840.4iydkzvvbogwojjr@mdosch.de> <20221031142707.fjk6sij47xq5uf6c@nileshpatra.info> <[🔎] 20221101190047.snoos36itd35p6sj@mdosch.de> <[🔎] CAFyCLW-Ow2JWqwGkmKe3RfsbJ5VvRUvfYy1eOQx9OPYiSEVd3A@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Shengjing,

On 02.11.2022 03:12, Shengjing Zhu wrote:

Let's not carry a local patch in golang-go.crypto.

Please work with upstream to include that.

There is already someone working to bring it upstream: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/218620
As you can see the latest changes were done end of September.

We should not include local patches for such a reason.

So, do you think it makes sense to packagegolang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal until upstream merges the patch?


Best regards,
Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal
  - From: Martin Dosch <martin@mdosch.de>
- Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal
  - From: Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal
Next by Date: Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal
Next by thread: Re: RFS: golang-github-caarlos0-sshmarshal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread