On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 04:22:52PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi, Hey, > > The current salsa-CI setting is designed in a way that it checks > that onupdating a package a reverse dep is not breaking (as things work this way in the > go world) -- great. > > However, it still lacks the intensive testing that usual > salsa_CI config has (build + i386build + lintian + reprotest + arch:any build + arch:all .. so on) > due to understandeable reasons for now (not much resources IIRC?) > > However I think the current config is not useful for packages that users will directly > use as programs, and which do not have an arch:all lib package. > For example: aerc, micro, riseup-vpn, go-sendxmpp et. al. and I would much rather like to use > the default salsa-ci config pipeline for these and I have changed it for a couple of them already. > > What do you think? And is there an objection in general? I don't see why the Go Team packages should not run _also_ the whole Salsa CI pipeline. Maybe some tests are not that relevant, don't know which and why, but I would be happy to see with my eyes what's going on instead of just assuming things. Pipelines are exceptionally good at breaking at the unexpected place. I made a naive experiment a couple of days ago [0] and included both the pipelines. It did not work, I evidently have quite some homework to do. Now, how to keep an overview of which pipelines are running where? Dom [0] https://salsa.debian.org/cavok/golang-github-iovisor-gobpf/-/pipelines/399438 -- rsa4096: 3B10 0CA1 8674 ACBA B4FE FCD2 CE5B CF17 9960 DE13 ed25519: FFB4 0CC3 7F2E 091D F7DA 356E CC79 2832 ED38 CB05
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature