Re: Errors Packaging Nebula
On 7/7/21 3:49 AM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> I personally like option (1) since it would require the least work on
>> behalf of the user. (And this is how I'm guessing the vast majority of
>> users scaffold it.) But, it would still fail if they started the unit
>> before configuring Nebula. Let me know what you think.
>
> Fair, option (1) looks like the most sensible thing to do. I agree
Take a look at my last few commits and see let me know what you think!
The postinst supplies some instructions that will allow users to create
a bare-bones configuration. I install the examples into the proper
directory and created a minimal configuration file.
>> I messaged him asking about import path substitution.
>> I'll let you know what I learn.
>
> Cool!
He said he will try to merge it today. I want to have nebula packaged so
we can just pull the newest version of the source and substitute the dep.
Thanks for all your help.
- Alex
Reply to: