Bug#469035: libc6-i386: include mutiarch ld.conf from i386
There's been a lot of misunderstanding. I would clarify it all but we're
missing the point of the bug.
When I was talking about multiarch, the concept, I was talking about the
idea, the purpose, the ability to run applications for other
architectures. I think we share this same goal. We differ on the
implementation, the deployment scheme.
It's obvious that I won't change your mind, the fact my scheme's working
for me is irrelevant. I don't have any failure reports but neither
successful, only people downloading packages.
El dl 12 de 05 de 2008 a les 04:07 +0200, en/na Aurelien Jarno va
escriure:
> So you are already able to make a change to a source package, that
> propagates automatically and generate new converted packages?
Security updates are automatically propagated.
Regarding the arch combinations you're suggesting, I admit I can't help
since I don't have those resources.
I don't pretend to push all these packages into the official archive.
You've made clear your intentions. And without those packages, my scheme
will never be official.
Sure, if you include the configuration file I'll keep sending patches
that allow DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=multiarch, as it was already in pango. But
that doesn't make those versions official, does it?
So, including the configuration file doesn't imply any official support.
My packages won't be official and users know they can't use /usr/lib
without a risk of overwrite.
Would you reconsider it?
Reply to: