Bug#166414: apache: Apache non-functional after upgrade
GOTO Masanori said:
> At Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:59:58 +0800,
> Andrew Shugg wrote:
> > Sorry, libc people, this probably shouldn't have been left as 'grave':
> > you might like to lower it to 'important' or 'oh no, not again'. =)
>
> Or, 'normal'? :)
=)
> ...And, is this bug really same things as #165699, #165719, #165718,
> and #165699?
>
> Regards,
> -- gotom
Dunno. Probably. You'd need to ask the person who initially filed the
bug report. But I would say yes, it can probably be merged with those
other ones.
Andrew.
--
Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au> http://www.neep.com.au/
"Just remember, Mr Fawlty, there's always someone worse off than yourself."
"Is there? Well I'd like to meet him. I could do with a good laugh."
Reply to: