Re: Bug#155917: ifenslave_0.07+2.5.15-1(m68k/unstable/q650): FTBFS on m68k
At Thu, 8 Aug 2002 08:29:33 -0500,
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 07:12:05AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
> > > | ifenslave.c:270: `SIOCBONDRELEASE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > | ifenslave.c:270: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > | ifenslave.c:270: for each function it appears in.)
> > > | ifenslave.c:271: `BOND_RELEASE_OLD' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > | ifenslave.c:440: `SIOCBONDENSLAVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > | ifenslave.c:441: `BOND_ENSLAVE_OLD' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > | ifenslave.c:446: `SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > | ifenslave.c:447: `BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> > I'm very curious why those definitions are present in
> > /usr/include/linux/sockios.h on every architecture except m68k.
> > If there's a good reason, I'll make sure ifenslave won't be built
> > anymore on m68k. If there isn't, I think this bug should be reassigned
> > to libc6-dev.
>
> Hmmm, they are defined in the kernel source, but not the kernel-headers
> (at least as far as I can tell). This probably does belong to libc6-dev.
Kernel 2.2 already includes sockios.h, so the problem behind this is
m68k buildd building environment uses 2.0 kernel headers, I guess.
-- gotom
Reply to: