[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#155917: ifenslave_0.07+2.5.15-1(m68k/unstable/q650): FTBFS on m68k



On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 02:28:02PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 07:12:05AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
 
> > | ifenslave.c:270: `SIOCBONDRELEASE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > | ifenslave.c:270: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > | ifenslave.c:270: for each function it appears in.)
> > | ifenslave.c:271: `BOND_RELEASE_OLD' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > | ifenslave.c:440: `SIOCBONDENSLAVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > | ifenslave.c:441: `BOND_ENSLAVE_OLD' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > | ifenslave.c:446: `SIOCBONDCHANGEACTIVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > | ifenslave.c:447: `BOND_CHANGE_ACTIVE_OLD' undeclared (first use in this function)
 
> I'm very curious why those definitions are present in
> /usr/include/linux/sockios.h on every architecture except m68k.
> If there's a good reason, I'll make sure ifenslave won't be built
> anymore on m68k. If there isn't, I think this bug should be reassigned
> to libc6-dev.

Hmmm, they are defined in the kernel source, but not the kernel-headers
(at least as far as I can tell). This probably does belong to libc6-dev.

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<stephen@marenka.net>

Attachment: pgpes73PddpKc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: