[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Bug#958047: RFS: mercantile/1.0-1 [ITP] -- python3-mercantile - Web mercator XYZ tile utilities



On 4/24/20 11:03 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/22/20 9:10 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> The package needs to be reviewed, most likely some changes will be
>> required. I don't have time for a review today, maybe tomorrow or Friday.
>>
>> The first thing I did notice was an old changelog entry that should
>> likely be merged, you're the one closing the ITP.
> 
> debian/changelog:
> 
>  Have a look at this changelog for example, that's what a typical first
>  entry looks like (only the 'Initial release' change):
> 
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/python-stetl/-/blob/debian/1.0.8+ds-1/debian/changelog
> 
> 
> debian/control:
> 
>  Restructure the file with `cme` as documented in the policy:
> 
>   https://debian-gis-team.pages.debian.net/policy/policy.html#cme
> 
>  Using both debhelper (>=10) & debhelper-compat (=12) defeats the
>  purpose of debhelper-compat, use only that. See for example:
> 
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/pydecorate/-/blob/debian/0.3.1-1/debian/control
> 
>  Note that using compat 12 complicates backports to Ubuntu LTS releases
>  which the UbuntuGIS project does, as documented in the policy:
> 
>   https://debian-gis-team.pages.debian.net/policy/policy.html#debian-compat
> 
>  The markdown syntax in the extended description is not used by most
>  consumers of this data, it should just be plain text.
> 
>  Relevant policy section:
> 
> 
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#the-description-of-a-package
> 
>  The Documentation paragraph and the See .. for more paragraph are not
>  appropriate for an extended description.
> 
> 
> debian/copyright:
> 
>  While `licensecheck --deb-machine -r *` doesn't report the copyright
>  years, LICENSE.txt does and those are missing for Sean Gillies.
> 
>  The usual syntax for the Copyright field is:
> 
>   Copyright: <year-year>, <author>
>                   <year>, <other author>
> 
>  Notice the comma between the copyright years and copyright holder.
> 
>  The copyright documented docs/conf.py is also missing.
> 
>  The © symbol in copyright statements is useless, the field name
>  Copyright is sufficient.
> 
> 
> debian/patches/0001-removed-coveralls-from-test-requirements.patch
> 
>  The changelog entry from the patch description should be removed.
> 
>  The patch should also be marked as Forwarded: not-needed as documented
>  in DEP3:
> 
>   https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/
> 
> 
> debian/python3-mercantile.lintian-overrides:
> 
>  Overrides without comments explaining why the override was added are
>  bad.
> 
>  Instead of the library-package-name-for-application override, add a
>  mercantile binary package to include usr/bin, and have it depend on
>  python3-mercantile, see for example:
> 
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/python-stetl/-/blob/debian/2.0+ds-2/debian/rules#L41
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/python-stetl/-/blob/debian/2.0+ds-2/debian/control#L57
> 
>  Don't override wrong-section-according-to-package-name, either change
>  the section for the source package, or just for the binary package.
> 
>  The above example uses "science" for the source package, "python" for
>  the python3-stetl binary package, and "utils" for the stetl binary
>  package.
> 
>  Either add a comment for the embedded-javascript-library overrides
>  explaining why the libjs packages aren't suitable, or drop the override
>  and use the packaged versions.
> 
>  The python-stetl package does the latter, you can see the dependencies
>  in debian/control and symlinks are used to use the packaged JS files:
> 
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/python-stetl/-/blob/debian/2.0+ds-2/debian/links
> 
> 
> debian/rules:
> 
>  Put an empty line before the %: line.
> 
>  Grouping all pybuild options in exported environment variables is
>  preferred, so replace --test-pytest with export PYBUILD_TEST_PYTEST=1.
>  See for example:
> 
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/python-pyproj/-/blob/debian/2.6.0+ds-1/debian/rules
> 
>  Since the package is Architecture: all using
>  override_dh_auto_build-indep is not required, just
>  override_dh_auto_build is sufficient.
> 
>  Using an -arch or -indep override without also using the appropriate
>  option for the relevant dh_auto_* command is wrong.
> 
>  Building the docs should be done after dh_auto_build.
> 
>  The dh_link override and jdupes build dependency can be dropped,
>  removing duplicates is not worth it for such a small package. It's also
>  an unneeded diversion from upstream.
> 
> 
> debian/source/options:
> 
>  Don't ignore build artifacts, ensure that they are removed in the clean
>  target.
> 
> 
> debian/upstream/metadata:
> 
>  Drop the Changelog field, https://github.com/mapbox/mercantile/releases
>  is not a changelog. Upstream doesn't provide an annotated changelog
>  like QGIS does for example, so the field in upstream metadata has no
>  added value.
> 
>  Add the Bug-Submit field, see for example:
> 
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/python-stetl/-/blob/master/debian/upstream/metadata
> 
>  Also drop the Documentation field, it has no added value to the
>  documentation already included in the package.
> 
> 
> debian/watch:
> 
>  Handle common issues by adding dversionmangle & uversionmangle:
> 
>    https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#Common_mistakes
> 
>  See for example:
> 
>   https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/fiona/-/blob/master/debian/watch

Besides these issues, there is also a new upstream release.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1


Reply to: