Re: opencpn (was: opencpn: binaries without source)
On 29/11/18 21:50, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 11/29/18 8:46 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Having looked at the content of the OpenCPN tarball and not been pleased
> by what I saw, I'm staring to doubt whether packaging opencpn is worth
> the effort. Perhaps it should stay out of Debian where it doesn't have
> to conform to our standards. Having as many of its dependencies as
> possible packaged is still valuable, as long as those projects are sane.
Well, if that's your position we should perhaps just abort this work?
--alec
Reply to: