On related work, I've an outstanding TODO to merge several other map packages
A bunch of packages uses GSHHS maps, which should be merged. These include
the gshhs packages, magics++, zgygrib, matplotlib/basemap.
Should osmium be added to this?
On 11/03/2015 17:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
> On 03/06/2015 06:08 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 03/06/2015 05:56 PM, Jochen Topf wrote:
>>> I see you have set
>>> Upstream Author : Osmium Developers <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>> Is that right? Thats a general OSM developer mailing list. Not really
>>> Osmium specific. We currently don't have any Osmium-specific mailing
>>> address except my own. I could create some @osmcode.org alias if that
>>> makes sense?
>> I chose that based on http://osmcode.org/contact, I can change it to you
>> like for the existing osmium package or something else you prefer.
> The libosmium package is basically ready, the last outstanding issue is
> the preferred content of the Upstream-Contact field in the copyright file.
> This is currently:
> Osmium Developers <email@example.com>
> And I'm tempted to change it to the contact URL:
> Osmium Developers (http://osmcode.org/contact)
> While for the (old) osmium package it's
> Jochen Topf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> What is your preference as upstream developer?
> Kind Regards,
> Alastair McKinstry, <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org>, https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry
> Software is like Poetry - most of it shouldn't have been written.