Re: pycsw - precompiled docs
Angelos,
I just thought about this a bit more.
We must remove the docs now because it contains some google analytics
code which is not free software.
If in a next release the docs are build without google analytics I
think we can do without repackaging.
Johan
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Johan Van de Wauw
<johan.vandewauw@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Johan,
>>
>> Thanks for your effort, it is really appreciated.
>>
>> The docs inside the package are there as a reference to the users. If this
>> conflicts with Debian policy or something then I am ok removing them.
> For the enduser the difference is small since they can have the
> documentation as built in debian.
> I'm in favor of keeping it inside the source package also, but I'm not
> sure about the policy. I'll ask on debian mentors as well.
>>
>> Regarding cgi, this was added as a fast way to have pycsw working for
>> OSGeoLive. I have WSGI package also in my todo list and actually I would
>> prefer this solution since it is safer and faster.
>
> Ok, I'll switch to WSGI then. It is actually not more work than cgi.
> Just setting WSGIScriptAlias in the conffile and adding the right
> dependency (libapache2-mod-wsgi).
> The only advantage of cgi over wsgi that I see is that people could
> use other webservers than apache, but then again, they would have to
> configure it themselves.
>
> Johan
Reply to: